<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SocialStalking &#187; Stalking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://SocialStalking.com/index.php/category/stalking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://SocialStalking.com</link>
	<description>Answers to a new problem</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 13:50:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook Messages &#8211; control your privacy</title>
		<link>http://SocialStalking.com/index.php/2010/12/06/facebook-messages-control-your-privacy/</link>
		<comments>http://SocialStalking.com/index.php/2010/12/06/facebook-messages-control-your-privacy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 16:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>IdoNotes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Screencasts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook Messages]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://SocialStalking.com/?p=161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you have been limiting your kids from email all this time, it will be automatic for them according to Facebook.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Facebook Messages have begun rolling out to everyone at a slow pace.  If you never allowed them to have email before, they will soon.  Facebook Messages gives everyone the ability to have an email address and a chosen username.  If you have been limiting your kids from email all this time, it will be automatic for them according to Facebook.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://idonot.es/fDUKeU" target="_blank"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://i233.photobucket.com/albums/ee269/TheSocialNetworker/FacebookMessages-1.jpg" border="0" alt="Facebook,Facebook Messages,privacy,email" /></a></p>
<p>They also handle the interaction differently.  You are able to send and receive email just as messages would appear.  This ability open them to communication outside of the walled garden of Facebook itself. There are steps you can take to limit the communication of this new email ability through privacy controls.  We have a <a href="http://idonot.es/fDUKeU">screencast</a> and <a href="http://idonot.es/eYNZGK">podcast</a> (both from our sister sites <a href="http://idonot.es/fDUKeU">TheSocialNetworker</a> and <a href="http://idonot.es/eYNZGK">TheSocialGeeks</a>) does a quick walkthrough of the setup procedures and links to important help files.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.facebook.com/help/?faq=15702">new privacy settings</a> interested me more after reading them twice.  You are able to set the level of who can email you based on everyone, friends of friends and just friends.  that part fits the other models Facebook has implemented.  However, friends are able to email you from <strong>any email</strong> address they register with Facebook.  So this is a reverse privacy issue.</p>
<p>When you established your account with Facebook you provided a single email address.  Most people only have one.  Now Facebook is asking you to enter all of your possible email addresses so you could email in to any friend from any of them.  This gives Facebook even more information on you as a person by associating email names, domains and possibly company names (if you use your company email) with your profile.  People have not given this portion that much thought.</p>
<p>I would suggest you head out and quickly claim your name on Facebook, even if you do not use the email functions, ever.   An example is my network page on Facebook.  The URL would be <a href="http://www.facebook.com/IdoNotesNetwork">http://www.facebook.com/IdoNotesNetwork</a><a> (if you feel like becoming part, it is where I funnel all of my information on Facebook).  So read the linked help files in the sister postings, watch the short screencast and get your Facebook Messages under control early.</a></p>
<p>You can see the entire screencast in HD on YouTube or embedded below.</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="640" height="385" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/0VFUiiyhfsU?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640" height="385" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/0VFUiiyhfsU?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://SocialStalking.com/index.php/2010/12/06/facebook-messages-control-your-privacy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>School Superintendent suspended after Facebook post</title>
		<link>http://SocialStalking.com/index.php/2010/08/11/school-superintendant-suspended-after-facebook-post/</link>
		<comments>http://SocialStalking.com/index.php/2010/08/11/school-superintendant-suspended-after-facebook-post/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 14:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>IdoNotes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet_usage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[school]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[superintendent]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://SocialStalking.com/?p=158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Connecticut Superintendent of the Windsor Locks area, David Telesca, has been put on leave after comments found on his Facebook page, according to TheDay.com website]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have too many Facebook posting stories to cover each week, but this stood out in the common sense arena.  A Connecticut Superintendent of the Windsor Locks area, David Telesca, has been put on leave after comments found on his Facebook page, according to <a href="http://www.theday.com/article/20100806/NWS12/100809773" target="_blank">TheDay.com website</a>.  He did himself in right away after starting the new job and having the following occur:</p>
<blockquote><p>The Hartford Courant reports Telesca wrote on Facebook that his first  day on the $150,000-a-year job involved &#8220;counseling an administrator to  retire or face termination,&#8221; and ended the comment with a smiley face.</p>
<p>He also wrote that he slept until 10 a.m. on his first day, and it would be &#8220;the best job ever&#8221; if that happened every day.</p></blockquote>
<p>Apparently he is unhappy they caught and monitor such things as his Facebook page and says it is a violation of his contract.  This is where we step in.</p>
<p>Many of you know we offer training to parents, school officials and educators about proper usage and expectations in social network settings.  I imagine that there is no policy in place he signed or otherwise agreed to about such monitoring and fair usage.  We also know he allowed people associated with the district to see hos postings on the site through approving friend requests or opening his feed publicly.  Either way a certain level of conduct is always expected, but rarely enforceable.</p>
<p>We are finalizing the date for a webcast for training on this very topic for educators.  Join the email list to get notified under the Social Stalking list</p>
<form style="margin-bottom:2;" action="http://visitor.constantcontact.com/d.jsp" method="post">
<input name="p" type="hidden" value="oi" />
<span style="font-weight: normal; font-size: 12px;">Email:</span><br />
<input style="font-size:10pt; border:1px solid #999999;" name="ea" size="20" type="text" />
<input class="submit" style="font-family:Verdana,Geneva,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:10pt;" name="go" type="submit" value="Go" />
</form>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://SocialStalking.com/index.php/2010/08/11/school-superintendant-suspended-after-facebook-post/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Evil &#8211; a website showing phone numbers from Facebook</title>
		<link>http://SocialStalking.com/index.php/2010/06/08/evil-a-website-showing-phone-numbers-from-facebook/</link>
		<comments>http://SocialStalking.com/index.php/2010/06/08/evil-a-website-showing-phone-numbers-from-facebook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 18:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>IdoNotes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://SocialStalking.com/?p=152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Before you panic too much, Evil is a great implementation showing the lack of privacy controls most people place when posting information, such as phone numbers, into their stream.  Evil simply scans Faceook, blocks half the number for security and shows them at random on a webpage with an avatar of the person as well. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter" title="evil logo" src="http://www.tomscott.com/evil/h1.png" alt="" width="448" height="77" /></p>
<p>Before you panic too much, <a href="http://www.tomscott.com/evil/">Evil</a> is a great implementation showing the lack of privacy controls most people place when posting information, such as phone numbers, into their stream.  Evil simply scans Faceook, blocks half the number for security and shows them at random on a webpage with an avatar of the person as well.</p>
<p>The site owner also does a great job explaining how it works, how anyone could do it, no tricks involved and what parts of the Facebook API he uses to make it all happen.  While phone numbers can easily be changed by anyone in today;s world for security, it is amazing how much information is now tied to it and shows when doing searches in Google sometimes.</p>
<p>So go into the new privacy settings and beware what sharing selection is made when you make a post on Facebook.  If you have doubts, simply send it via a private message instead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://SocialStalking.com/index.php/2010/06/08/evil-a-website-showing-phone-numbers-from-facebook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook changed their security policy &#8211; what are your new settings?</title>
		<link>http://SocialStalking.com/index.php/2009/12/17/facebook-changed-their-security-policy-whar-are-your-new-settings/</link>
		<comments>http://SocialStalking.com/index.php/2009/12/17/facebook-changed-their-security-policy-whar-are-your-new-settings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 00:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>IdoNotes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Screencasts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://SocialStalking.com/?p=119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The first question to ask yourself is if you have gone into Facebook and verified the security settings on your account.  On my other blog, TheSocialNetworker, I did a quick 2 minute video showing you the changes Facebook has implemented to the default settings on privacy settings. You should be aware that their attempt is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first question to ask yourself is if you have gone into Facebook and verified the security settings on your account.  On my other blog, TheSocialNetworker, I did a quick <a href="http://bit.ly/5ZlOZv">2 minute video</a> showing you the changes Facebook has implemented to the default settings on privacy settings.</p>
<p>You should be aware that their attempt is to make more of the information you <img class="alignright" title="facebook logo" src="http://www.omcareers.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/facebook-small-logo-thumb-360x360-75537-thumb-300x300-78195.png" alt="" width="100" height="100" />have uploaded and continue to upload more public.  Meaning such things as pictures, profile information and wall posts available to the public stream.  You do have the ability to restrict this and should take the time to make the effort.</p>
<p>If you have been concerned with how much information is available about yourself online, this should raise that to new heights.  For Facebook to take the stance that they can make sweeping changes to publicize what was personal has many people deleting their accounts.</p>
<p>I could have seen Facebook implementing a feature request where you have to log in and select what items you wish to be public, and I mean area by area.  Not in large category scale.  Some would claim that would be a time consuming process and overhead they did not want to absorb.  I counter with the fact that you have already established security guidelines and expectations that apparently can be changed on a whim based on what advertisers wish and your expected growth.</p>
<p>Facebook is trying to become the phone book of the Internet.  <a href="http://bit.ly/5ZlOZv" target="_blank">Are you unlisted</a>?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://SocialStalking.com/index.php/2009/12/17/facebook-changed-their-security-policy-whar-are-your-new-settings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cyberstalking &#8211; that&#8217;s so 90&#8242;s according to our government</title>
		<link>http://SocialStalking.com/index.php/2009/09/30/cyberstalking-thats-so-90s-according-to-our-government/</link>
		<comments>http://SocialStalking.com/index.php/2009/09/30/cyberstalking-thats-so-90s-according-to-our-government/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>IdoNotes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stalking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyberstalking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://SocialStalking.com/?p=91</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While doing some research for an upcoming seminar, I ran across the Department of Justice report on cyberstalking.  Unfortunately it has not been updated since 1999.  While the posting itself is old, the changes in ways to obtain, view and find information has grown at a more rapid rate.  Protecting your personal information should be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While doing some research for an upcoming seminar, I ran across the <a href="http://www.usdoj.gov/criminal/cybercrime/cyberstalking.htm" target="_blank">Department of Justice report</a> on cyberstalking.  Unfortunately it has not been updated since 1999.  While the posting itself is old, the changes in ways to obtain, view and find information has grown at a more rapid rate.  Protecting your personal information should be the first step at defining your online presence.  So how was cyberstalking defined in 1999?</p>
<blockquote><p>Although there is no universally accepted definition of cyberstalking,   the term is used in this report to refer to the use of the Internet, e-mail,   or other electronic communications devices to stalk another person. Stalking   generally involves harassing or threatening behavior that an individual   engages in repeatedly, such as following a person, appearing at a person&#8217;s   home or place of business, making harassing phone calls, leaving written   messages or objects, or vandalizing a person&#8217;s property</p></blockquote>
<p>Pretty close to how we would define it now, with more emphasis on the tools and ways of contact.  The report refers to creating anonymous mailboxes somewhere on the Internet through an ISP.  How things have changed.  Now you have a presence all over social networking sites with tons of personal information shared in different levels depending on their defaults and your work at setting preferences.</p>
<p>I believe that this study/document needs a definite update to account for the explosion of sites that every age group is now participating.  We need stronger rules and laws that govern peoples actions in cyberstalking to add controls over the new features being offered.  The section on cybercrime is being updated regularly.  Shouldn&#8217;t the section on cyberstalking follow suit?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://SocialStalking.com/index.php/2009/09/30/cyberstalking-thats-so-90s-according-to-our-government/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook privacy combinations leave data open to search engines</title>
		<link>http://SocialStalking.com/index.php/2009/09/15/facebook-privacy-combinations-leave-data-open-to-search-engines/</link>
		<comments>http://SocialStalking.com/index.php/2009/09/15/facebook-privacy-combinations-leave-data-open-to-search-engines/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>IdoNotes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://SocialStalking.com/?p=89</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent article on TheNextWeb spotlighted a possible data leak for Facebook Notes to search engines.  The original report showed how using a simple Google query would bring up Notes from Facebook even with profiles set to private. Facebook soon responded that yes, the user profiles are private, but the Notes section for the users [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A recent article on <a href="http://thenextweb.com/2009/09/12/facebook-leaking-notes/" target="_blank">TheNextWeb</a> spotlighted a possible data leak for Facebook Notes to search engines.  The original report showed how using a simple Google query would bring up Notes from Facebook even with profiles set to private.</p>
<p>Facebook soon responded that yes, the user profiles are private, but the Notes section for the users was public.  A possible combination you can establish in Privacy settings.</p>
<p>This is one of the reasons we push you to watch the videos we are producing on how to properly set and check your privacy settings in Facebook to block unwanted content from being publicly available.</p>
<p>Most would not place or consider very personal information in Notes from everyone we have friended in Facebook.  But even simple information being placed there could be cached and found later through the search engines as you apply for jobs and school.  Referencing and joking about sexual content, racism or off topic jokes could be frowned upon and cost you something in the future.</p>
<p>Visit all of your settings and give them a check.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://SocialStalking.com/index.php/2009/09/15/facebook-privacy-combinations-leave-data-open-to-search-engines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook friends might be hackers</title>
		<link>http://SocialStalking.com/index.php/2009/09/09/facebook-friends-might-be-hackers/</link>
		<comments>http://SocialStalking.com/index.php/2009/09/09/facebook-friends-might-be-hackers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 03:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>IdoNotes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hackers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[password]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://SocialStalking.com/?p=86</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent rash of hackers have decided that emailing you and asking for money is just not the way to go.  Now, hackers are getting into the social networks and assuming identities of others and asking for money. One of the common ploys now is to pretend that the person they are imitating is out [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A recent rash of hackers have decided that emailing you and asking for money is just not the way to go.  Now, hackers are getting into the social networks and assuming identities of others and asking for money.</p>
<p>One of the common ploys now is to pretend that the person they are imitating is out of the country, or state depending on the scenario, and asking you to wire emergency money.  Sophos, the security company, noted this recently in an alert.</p>
<p>I know you say to yourself, well why would I send them anything.  I know it isn&#8217;t them.  Really I do.  Think carefully about the scenario itself.  A hacker with access to the social networks of the person in question (normally they use the same password everywhere) will be able to provide incredible amounts of personal data that they could use to try and convince you.</p>
<p>Imagine they break into your email or Facebook account and start asking friends for help.  Soon they send an email or Facebook note to back it up.  Why would the friend suddenly doubt it?  They know about your pictures, emails, communications and possibly even chats.  Odds are you would help.</p>
<p>So what can you do on both sides?  A secure password is a great place to start.  The rules are simple, so stop making life easy.  You can remember a random alphanumeric string of at least 8 characters.  I am sure you can.</p>
<p>If you get one of these emails, be diligent in asking all the right questions.  Did you even know your friend was out of town?  Do you know where they were headed? (don&#8217;t send money to Germany when they are in South America).  can they verify anything at all that you would know that wouldn&#8217;t be on the networks themselves?</p>
<p>Scary thing is, you are finding it hard to find items you haven&#8217;t placed on the networks aren&#8217;t you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://SocialStalking.com/index.php/2009/09/09/facebook-friends-might-be-hackers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook apps stealing your data? Facebook shuts some down</title>
		<link>http://SocialStalking.com/index.php/2009/08/28/facebook-apps-stealing-your-data-facebook-shuts-some-down/</link>
		<comments>http://SocialStalking.com/index.php/2009/08/28/facebook-apps-stealing-your-data-facebook-shuts-some-down/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 18:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>IdoNotes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reputation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://SocialStalking.com/?p=80</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We often give you insight into controlling the data you share across the networks and teaching the kids on what should be considered good sharing and bad sharing.  This falls into reputation control. Apparently some apps were pulling your credentials and starting to spam your contacts with phishing sites.  Trend Micro are reported to have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We often give you insight into controlling the data you share across the networks and teaching the kids on what should be considered good sharing and bad sharing.  This falls into reputation control.</p>
<p>Apparently <a href="http://bit.ly/13U0aD" target="_blank">some apps</a> were pulling your credentials and starting to spam your contacts with phishing sites.  Trend Micro are reported to have uncovered them and reported back to Facebook who pulled them.  Be on the lookout for some of the following:</p>
<blockquote><p>So far, six malicious applications have been identified: &quot;Stream&quot;, &quot;Posts&quot;, &quot;Your Photos&quot;, &quot;Birthday Invitations&quot;, &quot;Inbox (1),&quot; &quot;Inbox (2)&quot;</p></blockquote>
<p>So this goes beyond the simple matter of what information your produce but into the matter of friends trusting the links you produce and protecting that reputation.  If you start spamming contacts or sending harmful information, they soon distrust your data and many remove you as contacts.</p>
<p>Peek at the links before clicking and pay special attention to the applications you are loading.  For the younger audience, <a href="http://i.i.com.com/cnwk.1d/i/bto/20090819/FacebookFergusonRogue.png" target="_blank">this screenshot</a> from Trend Micro shows where to start looking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://SocialStalking.com/index.php/2009/08/28/facebook-apps-stealing-your-data-facebook-shuts-some-down/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MySpace and the 90,000 confirmed sex offenders. No surprise here</title>
		<link>http://SocialStalking.com/index.php/2009/02/04/myspace-and-the-90000-confirmed-sex-offenders-no-surprise-here/</link>
		<comments>http://SocialStalking.com/index.php/2009/02/04/myspace-and-the-90000-confirmed-sex-offenders-no-surprise-here/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 19:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>IdoNotes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MySpace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex offender]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialstalking.com/?p=60</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Before we even begin down the tube on this posting, I want to say that in no way is MySpace a haven for these offenders.  They are everywhere, all networks.  You might be sitting next to one in your office or one lives up the street.  MySpace has taken a stance to remove the profiles [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before we even begin down the tube on this posting, I want to say that in no way is MySpace a haven for these offenders.  They are everywhere, all networks.  You might be sitting next to one in your office or one lives up the street.  MySpace has taken a stance to remove the profiles of these people (<a href="http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/2009-02-03-myspace-offenders_N.htm" target="_blank">USA Today article</a>).  They have even gone so far as to begin building safeguards in allowing anyone over 18 to search the profiles of those below 18.</p>
<p>Let me focus on that issue for a moment.  While this is a major step by a social network of this size, who validates the birth year for anyone on any social network?  How many of you actually use your real birth year?  Yes, I am talking to you.  You know you do not.  Even the Attorney General of Connecticut, Roy Blumenthal, states he knows there is fake names/birthdays in <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/04/technology/internet/04myspace.html" target="_blank">this NY Times </a>article:</p>
<blockquote><p>Mr. Blumenthal said in a statement. “For every one of them, there may be hundreds of others using false names and ages.”</p></blockquote>
<p>One of the facets of the online social networks is not the fear of using them.  It should be the responsibility of the person to secure their information that they intend to share.</p>
<p>It is admirable that the attorney generals of states are taking this stance, even working with Facebook now, but what about the ones that have alternate names or have not been caught?  That goes back to you, the public using the sites.  I get a lot of feedback from readers saying the sites should do more.  I agree and hope that we make a difference.  But it all has to start with the parents and your own ability to protect your information.</p>
<p>So make a visit to your kids friend list and even your own.  Take a new visit to the privacy section and see what you are sharing.  I am often surprised.  Then again I am not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://SocialStalking.com/index.php/2009/02/04/myspace-and-the-90000-confirmed-sex-offenders-no-surprise-here/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hiding your Facebook pics? So you thought</title>
		<link>http://SocialStalking.com/index.php/2009/01/28/hiding-your-facebook-pics-so-you-thought/</link>
		<comments>http://SocialStalking.com/index.php/2009/01/28/hiding-your-facebook-pics-so-you-thought/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 02:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>IdoNotes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[picture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialstalking.com/?p=55</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I found this twist to Facebook security settings rather interesting.  it all started from a story I read on AllFacebook.com.  A quick snippet from their posting: Earlier this week I noticed that one of my friends had made their Facebook profile photos no longer visible. I wasn’t sure if this was because they had put [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found this twist to Facebook security settings rather interesting.  it all started from <a href="http://www.allfacebook.com/2008/12/a-flaw-in-facebooks-privacy-the-facebook-peer-group-effect/" target="_blank">a story </a>I read on AllFacebook.com.  A quick snippet from their posting:</p>
<blockquote><p>Earlier this week I noticed that one of my friends had made their Facebook profile photos no longer visible. I wasn’t sure if this was because they had put me on a restricted friend list or if they had simply removed their profile photos. I awkwardly asked my friend why I had been blocked from viewing his photos and he said that he blocked everybody so his boss wouldn’t see his less professional photographs. Unfortunately my friend didn’t understand the power of Facebook’s custom privacy settings.</p>
<p>Within a day or two, that same friend had been tagged in another photo which ultimately made it to my news feed.</p></blockquote>
<p>I ran through this same scenario with our teenager daughter who decided it was time to have a Facebook account.  While you may protect your own photos from being seen, if someone tags (ie: says it is you when posting a photo) and we share the same common friend, then I will see the picture.  <em>Point blank, no hiding it</em>.</p>
<p>Where does this fit in SocialStalking?  Imagine this scenario a couple of ways.</p>
<ol>
<li>Your boss happens to watch Facebook, or even a prospective employer.  They don&#8217;t see anything wrong with what you post and have checked you out quite often.  Then you attend a party when you were to be at work.  Or worse yet get caught in a compromising position during a picture.  That other person posts the pic and tags you.  Soon that picture you would have never posted ends up in a stream to be seen.  Your privacy features do not control that by default.</li>
<li>You are a young adult out at parties drinking before legal age.  You would never tell your parents this, but like a smart parent they watch your friends on Facebook also to get an idea of how your friends behave.  The friend posts a photo of you, tagged,  in a group of drinking teenagers.  This, of course, shows in the picture stream your parent see.</li>
</ol>
<p>The example list goes on to include pictures of you somewhere you were never intended to be.  Inside of Facebook you should visit <strong><em>Settings &#8211; Privacy Settings  &#8211; News Feeds and Wall</em></strong> to control what you allow to be placed across the streams.</p>
<p>However, the current privacy settings in Facebook <strong>DO NOT ALLOW YOU TO CONTROL THIS</strong>.  So if you are caught in a photo and get tagged, the best you can do is remove that friend.  However, it is to late by then</p>
<p>P.S. I found a good safety refresher <a href="http://joipodgorny.wordpress.com/2009/01/09/social-media-safety-refresher/trackback/">right here</a> by Joi and another from Jun 08 <a href="http://wellbelove.wordpress.com/2008/06/03/facebookprivacy/">right here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://SocialStalking.com/index.php/2009/01/28/hiding-your-facebook-pics-so-you-thought/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

